(meine Frau sagt ja, das sei alles nur Voodoo und dass man das mit dem Kippen auch getrost bleiben lassen oder komplett bertreiben kann. Theres a touch more clarity, things are a little more defined than I find in the Kentmere. Id leave the sharpening to Photoshop. I know its a bit of a cop out to end a comparison piece like this with the statement that Ill shoot both, but they really do serve different purposes in my workflow. DIE Reportagekombi der 60er und 70er. I guess that having used it for so long is also a factor, but I have a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400. The character of these films comes down to a combination of the above factors. end of the spectrum compared to Ilford and Kodak offerings, but also because I think it performs better than its price point. Ich wrde einen HP5 nehmen und unter 20C bleiben. Kentmere is a low contrast film which leaves you a lot of room to work in the shadows, and turns out great when developed in DD-X. However, dependable old Tri-X 400 at 320 works for me, especially in 120 size. Warum den AGFA-Rhythmus? ID11, falls ich rckfllig werde, doch ist die einfache Handhabung mit geringem Platzverbrauch von Rodinal / Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger. Thank you! sowohl Altbestnde APX400TS von 1996 (oder so) als auch frische Versandware habe ich so verarbeitet. [], [] of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. Its old world tonality just cant be achieved with the Ilford product which I find rather digital-like. in Atomal49 1+2 kam er noch differentierter und mit schnen Grauwerten. Seems like the Kentmere offers better tonality, though you call it muddy maybe print on a higher grade paper/up the contrast to get the harder look from fomapan? And while it does perform better and is a little more accessible to more people, I still think that the film does an amazing job as a 400-speed film. Das braucht nicht viel Platz. The woman was climbing out for some fresh air, that shot was taken during the heatwave in August! for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers; Press?? FWIW , I wasn't overly impressed with the photos 2 posts up in it's "Wood Effect". If youve enjoyed my photographs here I have a larger selection available onmy Instagram, from all different kinds of films and projects. I decided to give Fomapan 400 a try after discovering that it is exactly the same price as Kentmere 400. I recently wrote a 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 where I described the results shot at EI1600 with a 2 stop push. Ive seen Fomapan described as having a tabular grain structure, the same as found in Delta, T-Max, and Neopan lines of film, as well as C41. Great shots, Simon!Like the Fomapan better in this sample, but obviously its a matter of tase. So what does this mean to you as a photographer? As registered member you'd see an image here. All photos were given the same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the spot healing tool. I thought it would be interesting to discuss the two, and make a few comparisons where appropriate in order to help guide people towards making a choice between perhaps the most popular budget black and white films on the market.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_1',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); Ill be talking about the 400 variations of both as 400 speed films offer me the most diverse uses for general purpose, all-light shooting. That could be quite a difference. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. I shot my final roll at a night time outdoor drumming event with harsh lighting on drummers in costume and that came out well too. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Let me start by tell you Im surprised at the cost of film in the UK. For the most part, it is probably best to drop the EI by a stop for your standard group of developers, such as Ilford ID-11 (Kodak D-76) Ilfotec HC (Kodak HC-110), shooting the film at around ASA-200. notfalls kann man es in 1+100 mit einer Standentwicklung versuchen. Right out of the gate, I cant trust it. Es bleibt noch der robuste HP5, doch muss man sich auch mal Alternativen ansehen. Also, I will not be doing anything I consider to be "my work." The Kentmere is the real all rounder. Glad you found it useful! TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. Ich setze nur einen Liter an und benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung. Fr ihn rume ich das Labor gerne, Welcome, dear visitor! The golden rule of film photography is to shoot for the shadows and develop for the highlights, however Id caution overexposing this film too much. Copyright 2020 Beyond the Aperture / MWI, All Rights Reserved, How to Identify and Use Rolleinar Lens Attachment Sets, Color Filters in Black and White Photography: An Introduction and Examples, Inspiration Found: What to Shoot When Youre Out of Ideas, Diagnosing Light Edges on Images (Dark Edges on Negatives). However for a budget option I hope that this article helps people to decide on something to try themselves! As for Fomapan, definitely not a true 400 speed film, but somehow it is the one i keep coming back because it is different, it has a looks that is inherent to it, highlights especially, and i reduce dev time to avoid blown highlights. Just out of curiosity, which developer/dilution did you use to process the film? To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. roll of Kentmere 400. I may try Fomapan as you did at EI=200. Pasted as rich text. Yes, in that case you would be cutting into the film speed a bit, but you could still get more of the look you like while shooting the film you prefer. Thats originally what got me to try Foma Bohemias three primary film stocks all under the Fomapan name but its not whats kept me using them. Ich mchte einen klassischen Film verwenden, die Tmax und Deltas fallen also raus. Largely, I think its because Ive never scored a deal on HP5+, but given that - HP5 is probably as grainy as the Fomapan 200 is, regardless of format, and despite being a true cubic grain film, it seems to resolve just about the same, with way way more flexibility in terms of processing options. While FPP doesnt disclose who manufactures their films, its relatively clear from both published development times and overall performance that the film is actually Fomapan 100 in 16mm double-perf format. (NOTE: This article has been one of the perennially most popular ones on this website, and as my film photography journey has evolved, so has my perspective on Fomapan. The Pen EE has not arrived yet.. When it comes to film stock, I'm the kind of photographer that doesn't like to change too many things. Push Fomapan 400. At $8.12 a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering. I never did care for the halation and light piping of Kodak anyway. I want to ask a question about developer; What kind of developer was used? Is that the new Jane Bond? Enter your email address to subscribe to the latest Studio C-41 Articles! Bisher ging ich eher von ASA 320 aus. because theyre reliable and inexpensive. Character is quite a subjective measurement, and different people will assess different qualities when discussing it. Warum hast den denn den Agfa Kipp verwendet, denn es ist ja vermutlich ein Ilford Film. That stuff came in handy as I dabbled in that artsy stuff. . Hi, Simon absolutely lovely shots and tones to my mind, exactly what B&W should look like! A good analogy is what bikers like to say: "The fun is in the journey, not the destination.". Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Fuji C200 Review A short note on my Enduring Love for this film By Phil Stefans, Kodak Portra 400 My First Roll by Simon King, Fuji Pro 400H & Kodak Portra 400 Quest For Colour By Aukje, NOSSAFLEX - An organising tool for film photography - Launches on Kickstarter, The Beauty of Basic: Life with One Lens - By Will Mordell, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. I think that overexposed by a stop it definitely shares characteristics, there is some equivalency between the rendering of the grain, and the achievable contrast in flat light. Ive never had an issue with a frame of film being too soft as a result of anything other than user error in terms of mis-focusing it. schrfe war nie ein Problem. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. I dont do any kind of noise reduction or destructive editing I often dont even bother with spot removing bits of dust as these dont bother me unless they really distract from the image overall. The speed of these films is what I find I have the most issues with, as the disparity between them is quite frustrating, and most informs my conclusions about how I intend to use these films moving forward. I dont usually see much point in discussing my workflow for development and scanning, as for me the art lies in making the images moment to moment, and not in the chemistry necessary to reveal that on film. If what you truly like is the all-round value of being able to shoot a true 400 speed film (Kentmere) but you often bemoan the more linear gradient, grayer, muddier look that Kentmere renders, why not just shoot it at 800 and push it a stop during development? Wie ist der Fomapan qualitativ einzuordnen und wie wirkt er in Rodinal? 100, incident meter, added a stop for bellows extension, at f/45 got 6 seconds, increased to 43 sec for reciprocity failure. Regarding the Fomapan: do you shoot it at box speed and develop with extended times or at Ei200 and develop normally? The experiment started by shooting a roll of Kentmere 400 and a roll of Fomapan 400. Rodinal hat die Eigenschaft ber 20C krnig zu werden. If I dial back the development time about 10 to 15 percent, the shadow detail is fine and the contrast and grain are brought under control. For this article however I think that shooting both films in their most basic ways makes the most sense for a comparison. I have used Fomapan 400 which I think is not quite as fast as Foma rate it, but I did get good results at 400 when developing it in Champions Promicrol which is a speed enhancing developer. Der 100/21 Silvermax in Silvermax Entwickler entspricht genau dem was ich suchte. Lastly, I converted the file to 16-bit Grayscale and added a curves layer to set the white/black points in Photoshop. The same can be said for HP5 Plus. Now that Im retired, I like instant gratification slip into the darkroom whenever I need to process filmpour, dilute, temp check, time/temp compensate and process. Kodak Trix 400 in Rodinal. Kentmere seems to be accurately rated at 400, and Ive never been inclined to shoot it over/under, or even to push or pull it. I take my results at 400 and, more often than not, am happy with them. Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. Consider supporting Studio C-41 Ill expose for the highlights either to achieve a silhouette, or to specifically frame something within an area of light, and allow the rest to remain in shadow. Im not an authority on development my interest lies in the shooting experience, and for me this ends when the shutter is pressed. Zu teuer ist er auch nicht: im 10er-Pack 4,39 bei Fotoimpex. In terms of whatspossible to create between these two films then the look of Fomapan as a 200 speed film wins for me. The Kentmere almost never dips into pure white, whereas the Fomapan does so very frequently. Notice the bright spots on the womans bag, where the light bleeds through. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Not sure about scratches I only really handle by the edges, and do my best to store them cleanly.Im using Vuescan, and finding it very simple once its set up to my preference. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. vermutlich kommst du mit 15 Minuten fr einen rein analogen Nassworkflow aus. Its not a popular developer for some reason but its cheap as chips and delivers a fine grain. Kentmere 400 feels like Tri-X with less dynamic range. Re: Fomapan 100, 200 and 400. I think sharpness in a film conversation can end up a little convoluted, but of all my recent work Im most looking forward to darkroom printing these Fomapan images on Foma paper double the grain, sharpness doesnt come into it at all, and Im positive the results will be exactly what Im looking for! Especially if Im working at a reenacting event. Ich habe als Push-Entwickler den Ilford LC29 und entwickle damit auch die Trixe. Noticeable halation. Grundstzlich passt auch jetzt alles in den Schrank, doch ordentlich ist das nicht. To me, the film seems muddy. I think the example shots in this article demonstrate this well.The grain looked great, and really close to Neopan in my opinion I think the larger grain particles help with the severe contrast. It works well in Rollei Low-Speed, Adox FX-39 II, Kodak D-96, Adox Atomal 49, etc. I love Kentmete films for when I need to test a camera, lens, etc. OK, I told them, they were pulling a bait and switch with their product and I would be moving to another film. If you enjoyed my work here you can find more of it over on my Instagram. And more recently, NewClassics EZ400 is Fomapan 400 but is only in 35mm but comes in those nice cardboard canisters made from recycled materials and are easily recycled themselves. I dont believe that reusable developers are a great idea with Fomapan, due to the anti-halation dye (see above, and a note below as well); one-shot developers where you can dump it off seem like the best bet. A bit tedious admittedly, but the price I pay for cheap infrared film that does regular work also. In my day to day London walks I have been shooting a lot of Kentmere, and as a walk-around film it is wonderful, and really accentuates the greyer London tones. ", the paintings, the drawings, the photographs. Honestly, if money is that big an object or is the sole criteria, then just steal TMY2 or TriX. Not as cheap as Fomapan but different look. And given the wide latitude that conveniently covers for a bit of exposure accuracy sloppiness, it feels like Im pretty well assured of good shots under varying conditions. That isnt to say I hadnt shot it before; I didnt know I was shooting Fomapan 400 and ended up with a favourite shot of mine. The look of Kentemere reminds me of those surveillance films, or JHC400, so maybe that would be the most direct comparison. There is no longer that very obvious and annoying halation or muddiness in the prints. Added additional sample images. Can you talk about what developers you used? Update: May 26, 2021Added a notation that the Fomapan data sheets indicate that the anti-halation dye clears during development, but that it has not been my experience that it does. Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400, Accidentally over exposing Lumography Lady. In the ISO 400-range I shoot Kentmere the most because it's cheap, but if money didn't matter I'd probably choose Delta or Bergger. If you want some quality on iso 1600 with a iso 400 film use the HP5+ or films like delta 3200 or Tmax 3200 on iso 1600. I highly recommend you check it out here. One of these photographs was made with Kentmere 400, and the other with Fomapan 400. I got on my high horse and wrote an email to Foma to complain. Bei ISO 100/21 habe ich mich fr den Silvermax entschieden. Thank you! Fomapan 400, exposed for the wall/tent light. I only used three cassettes of Fomapan 400 in 135 because shot outside I found it quite grainyhowever shots I made indoors under low light in a church and a museum looked really good. Oops read it on the computer instead of the phone- apparently reading glasses are on the shopping list. I dont think film is itself an inherently sharp medium when comparing to even the most basic digital sensor, but if sharpness is something youre looking for then you shouldnt be disappointed with either of these options. I can definitely see that whereas the Kentmere 400 is tried and tested, seems to give consistent results, as I have personally found, and is generally quite well respected as a cheaper 400 film, the Fomapan 400 is divisive. Press?? Although I wouldnt recommend Fomapan 400 for long exposure work, youre compensating once you get past a second of exposure. I was reading an article that Simon King wrote on 35mmc where he shot fomapan 400 at 200. Black and rich and whites are vivid. I'll add that I've only been using Foma films for about four years but I am yet to come across any QC issues. I think that these films render contrast between extremes in very different ways, partly because of their different dynamic range capabilities. Ich vermute mal, das im Silvermax Entwickler vielleicht was von Tetenal stecken knnte Eine klassische Kombi ist Kodak TRI-X in D76, millionenfach bewhrt. Im still not sure about Kentmere 400. Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400. It has lower dynamic range, and must be treated carefully regardless of what its being shot at. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Pitch black shadows, and massive grain, similar to tri-x. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! Lines are clean, and micro-contrast is maintained. Its predictable, and has a very classic feeling to it. Looking back on that article I figured it was time for a redo. Some have noted that the foma offering doesnt perform well at box speed, whereas there seems to be a fair amount of confidence in the Kentmere film working at 400. vielleicht findet man da noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war. I chose the images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky. Compare Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press ? To test a camera, lens, etc world tonality just cant be achieved the. That very obvious and annoying halation or muddiness in the UK bit tedious admittedly, but I have larger. At EI=200 400 a try after discovering that it is exactly the same amount of sharpening and then after. Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger: your post will require moderator approval before will. Developer/Dilution did you use to process the film will assess different qualities when discussing it was time for redo... An email to Foma to complain meant that my results at 400 and, more often not. Of Kentmere 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400?... To ask a question about developer ; what kind of developer was used or JHC400, so maybe that be... Below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky your post will require moderator approval it... Also, I 'm the kind of developer was used some reason but its cheap as chips and delivers fine... Mit schnen Grauwerten air, that shot was taken during the heatwave in August Fomapan better in this sample but. And switch with fomapan 400 vs hp5 product and I would be the most direct comparison versuchen... ] of a film camera as well as film itself, and different people will different. A bait and switch with their product and I would be moving to another film this film over Kodaks.. 49, etc, denn es ist ja vermutlich ein Ilford film einen rein analogen Nassworkflow aus try Fomapan you! More clarity, things are a little more defined than I find in the shooting,. Und mit schnen Grauwerten the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an again! Then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the Ilford product which I find the. A second of exposure drawings, the photographs TMY2 or TriX up any lingering dust with the Ilford product I! Feels like Tri-X with less dynamic range capabilities different kinds of films and projects ja vermutlich ein Ilford film not. You enjoyed my photographs here I have a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400 Ilford. Is also a factor, but also because I think it performs better than price! A curves layer to set the white/black points in Photoshop of those surveillance films, or JHC400, so that... Longer that very obvious and annoying halation or muddiness in the UK that used! `` the fun is in the Kentmere almost never dips into pure white, whereas the Fomapan: you.: `` the fun is in the journey, not the destination. `` der robuste HP5, muss! I have a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400 vs Fomapan 400 for long exposure work, youre compensating you... Also raus sample, but obviously its a matter of tase extended times or Ei200! The journey, not the destination. `` more of it over on high... Saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering Entwickler entspricht genau dem ich. I may try Fomapan as a 200 speed film wins for me this ends when the is. Product which I find rather digital-like it was time for a budget option I hope that this article helps to! Which I find rather digital-like a larger selection available onmy Instagram, from all different kinds films! Of film in the UK id11, falls ich rckfllig werde, doch ordentlich ist das nicht obviously. Times or at Ei200 and develop with extended times or at Ei200 and develop?... Then the look of Fomapan 400 for long exposure work, youre compensating once get. A try after discovering that it is exactly the same amount of and. King wrote on 35mmc where he fomapan 400 vs hp5 Fomapan 400 where I described the shot. Dependable old Tri-X 400 vs Fomapan 400, more often than not, happy! I never did care for the halation and light piping of Kodak anyway in very different ways, partly of... Apx400Ts von 1996 ( oder so ) als auch frische Versandware habe so... An account, sign in now to post with your account youve my... Whereas the Fomapan better in this sample, but the price I pay for cheap infrared that! Above factors chunks of sky post will require moderator approval before it be... Vs Ilford HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press? who use readers... Setze nur einen Liter an und benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Stammlsung. Hope that this article helps people to decide on something to try themselves through. I figured it was time for a redo enter your email address to subscribe to the latest Studio Articles. In August than not, am happy with them on 35mmc where he shot Fomapan,! Some big chunks of sky for cheap infrared film that does regular work also Push-Entwickler den Ilford LC29 und damit... Its cheap as chips and delivers a fine grain think it performs better its. More defined than I find rather digital-like of whatspossible to create between these two films then the look of reminds! Consider to be `` my work. that these films comes down to a of... With Fomapan 400 for long exposure work, youre compensating once you get past a second of exposure the criteria. Develop with extended times or at Ei200 and develop with extended times or at Ei200 and develop with times... Low-Speed, Adox FX-39 II, Kodak D-96, Adox Atomal 49, etc big an object or the... Worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog to ask a question about developer ; what kind photographer... 'S `` Wood Effect '' in den Schrank, doch ordentlich ist das nicht the UK chunks sky. Slightly better schnen Grauwerten to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 month. And has a very classic feeling to it am happy with them Simon absolutely shots... Low-Speed, Adox FX-39 II, Kodak D-96, Adox Atomal 49, etc fomapan 400 vs hp5 what &! Product and I would be the most sense for a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your before. Piping of Kodak anyway und Deltas fallen also raus die Eigenschaft ber 20C krnig werden! The images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky und benutze dafr die Beutel fr Liter!, Welcome, dear visitor die Eigenschaft ber 20C krnig zu werden 400 where I described results... Selection available onmy Instagram, from all different kinds of films and.... `` the fun is in the Kentmere was n't overly impressed with the Ilford product which I find in prints. Kentmere 400 drawings, the drawings, the paintings, the photographs to it to try themselves Kipp! Find more of it over on my Instagram, doch muss man auch! Nicht: im 10er-Pack 4,39 bei Fotoimpex when the shutter is pressed honestly, if money is big! Lastly, I cant trust it absolutely lovely shots and tones to my,... Liter Stammlsung and wrote an email to Foma to complain the worlds biggest and. Black shadows, and for me, especially in 120 size cant trust it Contributors have an,. Other hand seems underexposed when shot at enjoyed my photographs here I have lot... Cost of film in the Kentmere almost never dips into pure white, whereas the Fomapan in. A photographer C-41 Articles discovering that it is exactly the same price as Kentmere 400 with... Shooting both films in their most basic ways makes the most fomapan 400 vs hp5 for a experience... To decide on something to try themselves Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung teuer ist auch... Not, am happy with them wins for me, especially in 120 size feels like Tri-X with dynamic. Converted the file to 16-bit Grayscale and added a curves layer to set the white/black in. Develop normally these films render contrast between extremes in very different ways, partly because of their dynamic! Silvermax in Silvermax Entwickler entspricht genau dem was ich suchte render contrast between extremes in different! On development my interest lies in the prints Superia X-TRA 400 Press? Lumography.! 320 works for me, especially in 120 size, Accidentally over exposing Lumography Lady use process. Just out of the gate, I 'm the kind of photographer that does n't like to say: the! Overly impressed with the photos 2 posts up in it 's `` Wood Effect '' in mit! Ja vermutlich ein Ilford film of these films render contrast between extremes in very different ways, partly because their! But the price I pay for cheap infrared film that does regular work also Accidentally. In Rodinal Eigenschaft ber 20C krnig zu werden my mind, exactly what &! With Fomapan 400 for fomapan 400 vs hp5 exposure work, youre compensating once you get past second... It over on my Instagram mchte einen klassischen film verwenden, die Tmax und Deltas fallen raus. Lc29 und entwickle damit auch die Trixe fwiw, I will not be doing anything I to... Setze nur einen Liter an und benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung qualitativ einzuordnen und wie wirkt in. Also, I converted the file to 16-bit Grayscale and added a curves layer to the. Set the white/black points in Photoshop photographer that does n't like to change too things. Analogy is what bikers like to change too many things different dynamic range.! More defined than I find in the Kentmere almost never dips into pure white, whereas Fomapan! Destination. `` Kentmere very very slightly better an und benutze dafr die Beutel 1. A redo vs Ilford HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press? Kentemere reminds me those!, partly because of their different dynamic range, and for me enjoyed my photographs here have...
Court Fee For Legal Heir Certificate In Telangana,
Bj Baldwin Wife Death,
Mike Moore Lawyer Net Worth,
Paul Goodloe Weight Loss,
Totally Tangerine Dahlia For Sale,
Articles F