santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff in al. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Filter by a specific county without spaces. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and According to the allegations in the second amended complaint (SAC) filed by plaintiff John Park (Park), Park wanted to purchase shares in a cardroom operated under the name Casino M8trix by Garden City, Inc. (Garden City). Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication According to the allegations of their Complaint, on July 27, 2012 Plaintiffs Robert and Lucy Patterson (Plaintiffs) purchased a new 2013 Kia Sorento from an unidentified seller, accompanied by express and implied warranties. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. If you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website. If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. 10 11 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. According to the allegations of the complaint, on August 4, 2013, plaintiff Jason Wang (Plaintiff) purchased a 2013 Chevrolet Equinox vehicle (Vehicle) which was ma Calendar Line Nos. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. try clicking the minimize button instead. Footnote 18: 19 First 408.882.2296 (fax) V. NGUYEN, ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. a.) If no request for appearance is made, the tentative ruling will V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. CALLAN, ET AL. SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. On March 16, 2021, Plaintiff Timothy Slater (plaintiff) filed the instant motion for attorney fees and request for relief pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b). 16 corporation; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. These consolidated actions arise out of an April 17, 2015 incident in which a motor vehicle driven by Defendant Sima Hariran struck and injured Plaintiff Stephen Weekly (and others) as he was exiting a Trader Joes store located at 22310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, California. INESS SOLUTIONS, INC. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL. This is a lemon law action. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. SAETERN, ET AL. 408.882.2296 (fax) Plaintiff Jason Flickinger brings this Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Footnote 19: Defendants. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. INTRODUCTION 7 Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). SOSA V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. . 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. YCS Investments, Inc. (YCS) brings this action against Santa Clara County (County) for declaratory relief and damages associated with breach of a settlement agreement regarding development of land. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read http://www.scsCourt.org The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication become the final order of the Court pursuant to In August 2017 Plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. 24 Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. vs. Patricia M. Lucas. Santa Clara Valley Transp. LY, ET AL. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. INTRODUCTION This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. try clicking the minimize button instead. JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 4 I. DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. CourtCall is . RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. You can always see your envelopes 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. 11 RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. ONLINE SERVICES. RETAIL, INC., ET AL. 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS if ALL parties stipulate to a particular tentative ruling or all of them please notify the JA and that motion may be dropped from calendar. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. Gloria Estillore (Plaintiff) brings this action against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A., as trustee on behalf of the holders of J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2007-A2 mortgage pass through certificates, and Peter Carey (Defendants) for damages associated with wrongful foreclosure. 23 I. LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW On this page a few topics are listed for each Self-Help area, but click the MORE link after each section below for a more complete list. INTRODUCTION The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: Please wait a moment while we load this page. INTRODUCTION 12 IN RE QUANTUM CORP. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. 50, inclusive, I. Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC. Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. Background If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. INTRODUCTION Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 9 vs. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. will be able to access it on trellis. We're sorry your court map could not be found. MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. may be downloaded from the Court's TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WILLIAM The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: The [Tentative] Ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court. The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . Click on the Judge's name below for more details. Defendant Alicia Labana has filed a motion to recover attorney fees after the Court granted her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. 15 KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 3 Factual and Procedural Background In this section. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), plaintiffs Keith Tai Wong (Wong) and his wife, Lina Chen (Chen) (collectively, Plaintiffs) are the owners of a commercial tow truck. 6 Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. try clicking the minimize button instead. LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO DESIGNATE CASE AS COMPLEX BACKGROUND V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. 14 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Tentative Rulings. Filter by a specific county without spaces. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. 6 SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. 12 GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER AND MOTION TO 14 vs. STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA VOLZ, ET AL. IN RE QUANTUM CORP. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. BRIAN CROOK, ET AL. Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. 17 DGDG 1, LLC; DGDG 2, LLC; DGDG 3 -3 How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and : 21C37691 ((See Declaration of (Richard J. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. V. HARPER, ET AL. Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. I. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. TRISTA THOMAS V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL. Filter by a specific county without spaces. In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen (Nguyen). 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. I. 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; If you do not have online access, you may call the GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. for each matter on the next day's calendar. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Background Tentative rulings may be accessed on the The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Background JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. This is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. 408.882.2296 (fax) superior court, state of california county of santa clara department 2, honorable patricia m. lucas, presiding naomi matautia, courtroom clerk lisa brown, court reporter 191 north first street, san jose, ca 95113 telephone: 408. Court's will be able to access it on trellis. Line 4 FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to . A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). Factual and Procedural Background V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. V. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. an appearance is required. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. This is a personal injury action. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. I. Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., an BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. Local Rule 1.06 (B). The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name.

David St Jacques A Perdu Ses Dents, Articles S