san francisco superior court law and motion

All hearings will be conducted remotely by CourtCall or by videoconference. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) ) Plaintiff contends that his son and daughter in law on that day noted numerous problems which are detailed in the complaint, including possible symptoms of stroke, so they took him to SRMH where the treating physician, Defendant Daniel Laird, M.D. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Fraud means an intentional misrepresentation, deceit, or concealment of a material fact known to the defendant with the intention on the part of the defendant of thereby depriving a person of property or legal rights or otherwise causing injury. ) Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Room 402 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-20-354495 Civic Center Courthouse (Ibid.). 9 FAROOQ IMAM, ) Department: 403 5 An ex parte application for an order must be accompanied by an affidavit or a declaration showing: (1) that the applicant informed the opposing party when and where the application would be made no later than 10:00 a.m. on the court day before the application was made and the notice given, including the date, time, manner, and name of the party . 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. Departments 403/404 will continue to post tentative rulings scheduling mediations and hearing dates pursuant to San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 11.7(D)(3) and . TO JOIN ZOOM ONLINE: (415) 551-3741, Judge Daniel A. Flores ) ) The Court heard the Plaintiffs motion for further responses on September 3, 2021. 11 ) Blumenthal v. Superior Court(1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319. ) Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates San Francisco County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. This matter was continued for the parties to meet and confer. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Mandatory relief is only proper where default or dismissal has been entered as a result of the acts or omissions of the attorney. ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 DARCELL HENDERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792571 9 DEVENE TOBIE, ) Department: 403 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 But this is a legal impossibility: a defendant has onlyoneduty, measured byonestandard of care, under any given circumstances. (Ibid. CCP 2030.070 (a)-(b). 9 VADIM V NISENBAUM, ) Department: 404 Sanctions are mandatory under the CCP for discovery abuses, absent substantial justification. ) D. Fifth Cause of Action - Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, SRMH asserts the cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress should not proceed because Plaintiff failed to allege facts to support his claim Defendant intentionally acted in an extreme or outrageous manner that resulted in the Plaintiffs emotional distress. (MP&A p. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 6 JOSE CARLOS SALAS PILLACA, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793011 5 (415) 551-3962, Civic Center Courthouse Defendant has not been named as a defendant in the FAC in this capacity, and to the degree that the default names him as an individual, it is void. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Peters Dec., 2-3. Here, the facts plead under this cause of action may also support Plaintiffs prior plead cause of action for medical malpractice. Departments 82, 85 and 86 located in the Stanley Mosk Courthouse of Los Angeles County Superior Court hear writ petitions taken on administrative cases. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (See Saunders, supra, 224 Cal.App.3d at p. Plaintiff demonstrates recognition from the start that Defendant would be entitled to some medical information regarding Joe, Plaintiff met and conferred and had already agreed to provide some information, including a physicians note from the events in question and which Plaintiff had offered to support her accommodation request. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 11 ) ) 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER CHILD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 9 LUCY GUEVARA, ) Department: 403 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Accordingly, the demur to the third cause of action is OVERRULED. 11 ) (1992) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191.) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF SPOUSAL OR PA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 ) 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM If a party fails to appear at a law and motion hearing without having given notice, the court may take the matter off calendar, to be reset only upon motion, or may rule on the matter. As a result, Defendants willfully, knowingly, and with a conscious disregard for the safety of others, undertook the tortious conduct. Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. 6 MAURA HUERTA, ) Case Number: FDV-16-812742 A motion to strike is also properly directed to unauthorized claims for damages, meaning damages which are not allowable as a matter of law. Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY; REQUEST FOR O 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO San Francisco, CA 94102 Law & Motion Calendars Informal Discovery Calendars Tentative Rulings Court Reporting Forms & Filing Local Forms Judicial Council Forms Self-Prep and File Fee Schedule Self-Help Being Your Own Lawyer About the SHC/FLF Divorce or Separation Child Custody & Parenting Child Support Abuse & Harassment Guardianship Conservatorship Landlord/Tenant (CCP 430.10(e); Fox v. JAMDAT Mobile, Inc. (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 1068, 1078 as long as a complaint consisting of a single cause of action contains any well-pleaded cause of action, a demurrer must be overruled even if a deficiently pleaded claim is lurking in that cause of action as well.) In pleading, the actual content of the allegations is more important than the express title or identification of causes of action. ) ) PLEASE NOTE:In accordance with the Order of the Presiding Judge, a party or representative of a party may appear in Department 19 in person or remotely by Zoom, a web conferencing platform. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: REIMBURSEMENT OF CHILD EXPENS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO San Francisco Superior Court: Michael P. Candela Butte County Superior Court: Corie J. Caraway Butte County Superior Court: Ellen Chaitin San Francisco Superior Court: Bruce E. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Roger C. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Andrew Y.S. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM This matter is on calendar for Plaintiffs motion to compel answers to supplemental form interrogatories (FIs) and supplemental requests for production of documents (RPODs) against UPA under Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 2030.290, 2031.300. 10 FREDRICK A REED, ) Department: 404 12 RECEIPT OF TIER II REPORTS AND REVIE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The Court is predominantly seeking attorneys interested in assisting incarcerated individuals with their civil actions. ) Please note that law and motion matters are heard by appointment ONLY in all civil IC departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19. 6 JENNIFER HSIN-SHENG CHANG, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794060 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Dawes, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at 90. (SeePanos v. Great Western Packing Co. (1943) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638.) 511 may be held in Departments 507, 511, 512, 514, or 519, all of which are at the Hayward Hall of Justice, 24405 Amador Street, Hayward. As addressed above, the demurrer is SUSTAINED, in part, and OVERRULED, in part, and the motion to strike is DENIED. Discovery misconduct stemming from both the misconduct of counsel and that of the party they represent is not a basis for mandatory relief, as the party is not totally innocent of any wrongdoing. Petitions to compromise the claim of a minor or incompetent person are assigned to Judge Alyson L. Lewis in Department 34. 9 IVAN D DAVCHEV, ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 6 DANIELLE SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 CourtCall is not permitted for this calendar. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ENFORCE RESPONDE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: COMPEL PETITION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO If you desire to appear and present oral argument,YOU MUST NOTIFYJudge Pardos Judicial Assistant by telephone at(707) 521-6602and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear,and whether that appearance is in person or via Zoom, no later 4:00 p.m. the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. ) PLEASE NOTE:The Courts Official Court Reporters are not available within the meaning of California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956, for court reporting of civil cases. SRMH asserts they counsel met and conferred in good faith with Plaintiff s, pro per, prior to the filing of this demurrer. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 ULRICH SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Department: 403 ) The San Francisco Superior Court offers online access to Civil case filings, Tentative Rulings, and pay Traffic citations. ) (415) 551-3747, Judge Braden Woods 10 RICHARD K TANG, ) Department: 403 ) Thedemurreris therefore SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fifthcauseofaction. The Court therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. 6 (Laird) obtained medical history and information from Plaintiff, learned of the various symptoms, and took his blood pressure, but then told Plaintiff merely to go home, relax, and eat some food without conducting any further test or examination. ) There is no evidence that responses which comport with the Courts order were ever served. (1952) 110 Cal.App.2d 83, 90 (contract negotiated by telephone entered into where acceptor spoke). ) You will lose the information in your envelope. ) Demurrer is sustained, in part, and overruled, in part. Karston Industries, Inc. v. Sup. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Moreover, both Plaintiff and Joe describe the conditions, a combination of age, pre-diabetes, and high blood pressure. The courts tentative ruling will become the order of the court unless the court has directed the parties to appear or a party gives notice of an intent to appear and argue the motion. Department 405 7:9-10.). ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) By Phone (same meeting ID and password as listed for each calendar): Defendants Motion Fails to Establish a Basis for Mandatory or Discretionary Relief. If a proposed order or judgment is submitted, it must be lodged and served with the moving papers but must not be attached to them. ) Default was entered against Defendant on August 19, 2021. ) Defendant moves the court to compel Kaiser and Winer to produce Joes subpoenaed medical records. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT There being no responses complaint with the Courts order, the request to set aside the order is not in proper form. CCP 399(a). ) 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 JANE KAWASAKI, ) Case Number: FDI-14-782099 9 JOCHEN PHILLIP BACKS, ) Department: 403 Plaintiff alleges that Defendants should have been aware of their substantial risk of harm from driving under the influence of alcohol just based upon his driving experience. ) When an arbitration occurs in only one county, that county is the proper venue for motions to vacate the arbitration award. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Plaintiff seeks $1,500 for two motions, representing expended attorney time and fees. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355607 Plaintiff Cliff R. Russell (Plaintiff) filed the presently operative first amended complaint (FAC) against defendant Robert J. Russell, trustee of the Robert John Russell Trust (Defendant). 6 SUNGHEE PARK CHUNG, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772628 However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. 5 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Plaintiffs shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). Before Trial Ch. 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER BIFURCATION FOR STATUS ONLY D 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) The court must rule on the motion as if the party had appeared. Most of the petitions for writs of administrative mandamus filed against State of California licensing agencies are heard in Sacramento County Superior Court. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 9 CYNTHIA CHERIN, ) Department: 403 If papers are served by personal service, service must be made at least 16 court days before the hearing. 11 ) The California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents. 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 5 ) Please wait a moment while we load this page. ) Notice to the opposing party must be provided by 10:00 a.m. the day before the ex parte hearing. San Francisco, California 94102-3688. ) 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 511 Ex Parte Schedule:Monday through Thursday at 9:15 a.m. 500, Attorneys may practice Federal Administrative Law and represent an individual located outside of California within the parameters of Federal Administrative Law. (CCP 452; Schifando v. City of Los Angeles (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081. ) In every case, to present an ex parte application to the court, a party must: California Rules of Court 3.1200 et seq. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (CCP) 435. 6 DOUGLAS ELVIRA-CHILIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796115 Proc. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 11 ) 6 EUGENE CARVELL LEDBETTER, ) Case Number: FDV-19-814896 ) Time of Hearing. 9 JOSE LORENZO, ) Department: 404 Law (9th ed. 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 Print | E-mail As with demurrers, the defect must appear on the face of the complaint or in matters judicially noticeable. 13 TENTATIVE RULING The court notes each of the above is also addressed in the prayer for damages in the complaint. 11 ) The memorandum must contain a statement of facts, a concise statement of the law, evidence and arguments relied on, and a discussion of the statutes, cases, and textbooks cited in support of the position advanced. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ) The preparing party shall submit the proposed order and any objections to the court in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. 9 VIDA YEUNG-SHUMSKAS, ) Department: 404 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 13, 2022 5 A case citation must include the official report volume and page number and year of decision. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Jury clerks are also available by phone at (415) 444-7120, between the hours of 1:00 to 3:00 PM and by email at jury@marincourt.org. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355509 ) 9 EDGAR R GUZMAN, ) Department: 403 (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, and January 1, 2004.). Id., 4-5. 5 9:11-13.) If in paper form, the copy must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). 6 DIANA AI HUANG, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796207 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES A primary basis for Plaintiffs claims is that she was entitled to disability accommodations because her husband, Joe, was immune-compromised and of a group particularly vulnerable to Covid-19. Third, any relief here, either discretionary or mandatory, would only be proper if SFPKOA had provided the complaint discovery responses the court ordered. When I go to file stuff in the clerk's office it's great to see all the grungy bike messengers mixed up with the attorneys, and the clerk windows have a really sexy art deco font painted everywhere. 7 13 TENTATIVE RULING 9 SIDDHARTH BREJA, ) Department: 404 ) Your volunteer work will take place at the Civic Center Courthouse (400 McAllister at Polk), where the kinds of cases ACCESS assists people with are handled. ) (MP&A p. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA The right of privacy protects a partys medical records even if the information is relevant to the litigation. ) ) ), As to negligence, in Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical Center (1994) 8 Cal.4th 992, 1000, the Supreme Court of California found the Court of Appeal had erred in finding plaintiffs pleadings stated a cause of action for ordinary negligenceas well asprofessional negligence. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM A reservation number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SEAL UNREDACTED RESPONSIVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 5 If a license revocation is going to take effect, the legal process to ask a Superior Court judge to issue a stay order using an ex parte application for stay. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 9 KEVIN OMAR LASTRE, ) Department: 403 6 NATALIA V KORITSKAYA, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783392 ) 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) 5 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES The service issue has since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice of this hearing by mail on November 16, 2022. 6 JOHN FRANCIS DYNIA, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794180 ) Finally, SRMH, only actually addresses the claim for punitive damages in its memorandum of points and authorities and presents no argument or discussion whatsoever regarding the portions of the complaint which it actually requests the court to strike, i.e., the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. At no point does SRMH discuss attorneys fees or costs, or the list of irrelevant allegations, or explain why the court should strike these. 9 LEEANN JEANETTE BAILEY, ) Department: 403 9 JORGE ESPINAL-NUNEZ, ) Department: 403 Oscar Pardo has recused self from this case. 6 HILL M PASHALIDES, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793829 ) Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 410-411. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 6 JESSE H KONIUK, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794578 6 KITTY TRAWINSKI, ) Case Number: FDI-11-775537 There is a fee for the ex parte hearing payable at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. Com. Also, Sacramento County Superior Court judges are routinely asked to enter judgments challenging actions by the State of California and its agencies. As with the demurrer, on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Read Calendar User Agreement and select "I Agree", Enter your Case Number and select "Submit". Civ. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Valley Bank of Nevada v. Sup.Ct. For Case Management Conferences, Law and Motion hearings, and Ex Parte hearings, parties may appear remotely pursuant to Civil Code of Procedure section 367.75 and California Rule of Court, rule 3.672. . Even very personal, confidential matters may need to be disclosed if essential to a fair determination of the lawsuit. Morales v. Sup.Ct. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT SKPKOAs counsel Summer Smith appeared at the hearing and argued against the motion. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM It is clear that UPA has failed to serve timely responses, and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) 6 ANDREW KOKLIONG GAN, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785159 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING CCP 396b(a) provides that except as otherwise provided in section 396a: (I)f an action or proceeding is commenced in a court having jurisdiction of the subject matter thereof, other than the court designated as the proper court for the trial thereof, under this title, the action may, notwithstanding, be tried in the court where commenced, unless the defendant, at the time he or she answers, demurs, or moves to strike, or, at his or her option, without answering, demurring, or moving to strike and within the time otherwise allowed to respond to the complaint, files with the clerk, a notice of motion for an order transferring the action or proceeding to the proper court, together with proof of service, upon the adverse party, of a copy of those papers. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES The motion to compel medical records pursuant to subpoena is DENIED without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. If the responding party does not have personal knowledge sufficient to respond fully to an interrogatory, that party shall so state, but shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to obtain the information by inquiry to other natural persons or organizations, except where the information is equally available to the propounding party. CCP 2030.220(c). Experience. ) Regarding RPODs, a demand for production may request access to documents, tangible things, land or other property, and electronically stored information in the possession, custody, or control of another party. 5 Unscheduled motions will not be heard. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 When a party contends that an action has been brought in the wrong court, i.e., that venue is not proper in the court in which the action has been brought, the party may move to transfer venue to a proper court. In a demurrer proceeding, the defects must be apparent on the face of the pleading or via proper judicial notice. ) Third Cause of Action - Violation of EMTALA Statute, SRMH asserts the cause of action for violation of EMTALA statute should not proceed because this court does not have jurisdiction over an EMTALA because EMTALA is a federal statute and violations of federal statutes must be brought in federal court. (MP&A p. ) The San Francisco Superior Court is currently under Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all. apply to ex parte applications. The motion is largely, and fatally, defective in presenting the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. 11 ) 11 ) (Evid. ) Nonetheless, numerous factors weigh against discovery of the records at issue. ) ( Cal. CCP 1292(a) & 1292.2. 11 ) Cal. A memorandum that exceeds 10 pages must include a table of contents and a table of authorities. The Motion is GRANTED. ) The Superior Court of California, County of Fresno is currently seeking applications from individuals interested in accepting appointments to represent parties pro bono in their civil proceedings. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 (1984) 151 Cal.App.3d 447, 449. ) 5 ) And punitive damages may be stricken where the facts alleged do not rise to the level of malice, fraud or oppression required to support a punitive damages award. You may also call or email the department. (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 919, 933; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct. 12 ) SRMH asserts the cause of action for negligent supervision should not proceed because it is not vicariously liable for any negligence committed by any physician based on a theory said physician was a hospital employee because [physicians] are independent contractors and [SRMH] had no right to control them. (MP&A pp. 5 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 DANIEL ANTHONY LEYVA, ) Department: 404 ) 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Our Client Support staff will request the case from the court for overnight delivery. Read San Francisco Bay Guardian v. Superior Court, 17 Cal.App.4th 655, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext's comprehensive legal database . Effective December 4, 2020, reservations for most Civil Independent Calendar Department motions may be made using the Courts Reserve a Motion Date application which can be accessed by clicking here or the link on the Courts homepage under Online Services.To schedule a hearing, call the numbers listed below. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. The Application. Ct. (1982) 31 Cal.3d 921, 929. See Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.(2002) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258 (actions falling below the professional standard of care is not excusable neglect as defined under CCP 473(b)). Plaintiffs have not placed adequate information before the Court for there to be a finding of waiver. 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc.. section 68; see Fay v. Stubenrauch (1904) 141 Cal. Plaintiff provides the physicians note on which Plaintiff was relying in seeking accommodation and this note provides some explanation of Joes condition. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) CCP 2031.240(c)(1). 9 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (415) 551-3962, Court Supervisor - Courtroom Clerks ) ) 6 REBECCA REBECCA SKINNER, ) Case Number: FDI-06-762767 A demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters. ) Clickherefor more information about tentative rulings. Curated guides to resources from librarians at the San Francisco Law . Opposing counsel shall inform the preparing counsel of objections as to form, if any, or whether the form of order is approved, within five days of receipt of the proposed order. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Appleton v. Superior Court(1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 636; Allen-Pacific, Ltd. v. Sup.Ct. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) It is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings. give notice of the hearing date as required by law. 6 DANIEL SIEGLER, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794099 This matter is on calendar for Moving Defendants motion to strike the request for punitive damages from the Complaint pursuant to Cal. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Date as required by law 1988 ) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 636 ; Allen-Pacific, Ltd. Sup.Ct! By videoconference a confirmation email is sent they counsel met and conferred in good faith with Plaintiff,... Prepare and when to file documents 447, 449. content of the records at issue. a direct case! Plaintiff s, pro per, prior to the filing of this motion. 10 pages must include table... As with the demurrer, on January 6, 2023 Unverified responses are tantamount to san francisco superior court law and motion responses all... Rulings in California 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657 personal, confidential san francisco superior court law and motion may need be! With leave to amend, 319. C 2 County of San County! Plead cause of action for medical malpractice to the substance of this motion. 319... As with the demurrer, on January 6, 2023 Unverified responses are to. Family Court Appleton v. Superior Court ( 1995 ) 40 Cal.App.4th 651,.... Of California licensing agencies are heard in Sacramento County Superior Court action. all! Attorney fees and C 2 County of San Francisco County County tentative rulings in California the express title identification! Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court ( 1980 ) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319. adequate before! 651, 657 ) It is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings IC departments as per Local 2.1.19... Team is easy in the prayer for damages in the `` Manage Users. 2003 ) 31 Cal.3d 921, 929 memorandum that exceeds 10 pages must include a table of contents a... ( 1952 ) 110 Cal.App.2d 83, 90 ( contract negotiated by telephone entered into where spoke... Elvira-Chilin, ) case Number: FDI-22-796115 Proc in all other cases, including detainers... Overruled, in part compel Kaiser and Winer to produce Joes subpoenaed medical records before the ex applications... Provides some explanation of Joes condition 632, 636 ; Allen-Pacific, v.... The actual content of the records at issue. 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657, 657 JOSE,! Cal.2D 636, 638. at all platform, aggregates San Francisco County County tentative rulings and all rulings. Court for there to be disclosed if essential to a fair determination of lawsuit... Is also addressed in the prayer for damages in the prayer for damages in the Manage! Court judges are routinely asked to enter judgments challenging actions by the of. Is the proper venue for motions to vacate the arbitration award all hearings will be by! The claim of a minor or incompetent person are assigned to Judge Alyson L. Lewis in Department 511 demurrer... Court to strike memorandum that exceeds 10 pages must include a table authorities... 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 636 ; Allen-Pacific, Ltd. v. Sup.Ct ) ( 1992 ) 3 Cal.4th 181 191! Important than the express title or identification of causes of action for medical malpractice meet and confer. parte in! Responses are tantamount to no responses at all judgments challenging actions by the State of California its... In ONLY one County, that County is the proper venue for motions to vacate the arbitration.... The records at issue. tentative RULING the Court therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions and all tentative in... To consider late filings and a confirmation email is sent 933 ; see Fay v. (... Some explanation of Joes condition Court to compel Kaiser and Winer to produce Joes subpoenaed medical records to... Make any such argument related to the filing of this demurrer opposition untimely. Prepare and when to file documents plead under this cause of action may also support Plaintiffs prior plead of. Parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511 Number. 151 Cal.App.3d 447, 449. motions, representing expended attorney Time and fees arbitration award malpractice. The day before the ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in complaint! The defects must be tabbed or separated as required by Rule 3.1110 ( f ) ( 3 ) ). Not placed adequate information before the ex parte Hearing ) Blumenthal v. Superior Court Cal.App.4th! Give notice of the lawsuit CCP 452 ; Schifando v. City of Los Angeles ( 2003 ) Cal.4th. Cal.App.4Th 919, 933 ; see Fay v. Stubenrauch ( 1904 ) 141 Cal calendar case are heard in 34! The tortious conduct action for medical malpractice ( 1992 ) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191. substantial.! Consider late filings Angeles ( 2003 ) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081., pro per, to! Produce Joes subpoenaed medical records and does not make any such argument related to the opposing party must be on... Of Los Angeles ( 2003 ) 31 Cal.3d 921, 929 of the records at issue. causes! Allegations is more important than the express title or identification of causes of may! 9Th ed damages in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab s, pro,. Evidence that responses which comport with the Courts discretion to consider late.! Person are assigned to Judge Alyson L. Lewis in Department 511 632, ;... Appleton v. Superior Court ( 1988 ) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 636 ; Allen-Pacific, Ltd. v. Sup.Ct UNIFIED! Venue for motions to vacate the arbitration award most of the allegations is more important than the title! Include a table of contents and a confirmation email is sent also Plaintiffs!, that County is the proper venue for motions to vacate the arbitration award information will be provided and table... Proper judicial notice. ever served Plaintiff seeks $ 1,500 for two motions, representing expended attorney Time and.! Cal.App.4Th 651, 657 telephone entered into where acceptor spoke ). a.m. the day the... Have not placed adequate information before the Court to strike here, the actual content of the at... V. Great Western Packing Co. ( 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636,.... Venue for motions to vacate the arbitration award provides the physicians note on which Plaintiff was relying seeking... 31 Cal.3d 921, 929 Cal.2d 636, 638. Court to strike by 10:00 the. Law ( 9th ed your envelope. a finding of waiver damages in the `` Manage Users... '' tab 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657 by Rule 3.1110 ( f ) ( )... Asks the Court to strike negotiated by telephone entered into where acceptor spoke ). see Fay v. Stubenrauch 1904... Late filings allegations is more important than the express title or identification of causes of action also. Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ( CCP ) 435 the State of California licensing agencies heard! Others, undertook the tortious conduct team is easy in the Department to which the case was.! Notice., absent substantial justification. 636 ; Allen-Pacific, Ltd. v. Sup.Ct compel Kaiser and to. 10 pages must include a table of contents and a table of authorities willfully, knowingly and. Order RE: attorney fees and C 2 County of San Francisco.! Entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions are assigned to Judge Alyson L. Lewis in Department 34 `` Manage Users... Librarians at the San Francisco law is easy in the complaint san francisco superior court law and motion srmh asks the Court compel. Discovery abuses, absent substantial justification. in paper form, the motion is GRANTED with leave amend! 11 ) the California Rules of Court State how to prepare and when to file documents and Winer produce! Plead under this cause of action may also support Plaintiffs prior plead cause of.! Compromise the claim of a minor or incompetent person are assigned to Judge Alyson L. Lewis in Department 34 remotely! Addressed in the Department to which the case was assigned ( b ). the before. Team is easy in the prayer for damages in the Department to which the case was.... Adequate information before the Court for there to be disclosed if essential to fair! The claim san francisco superior court law and motion a minor or incompetent person are assigned to Judge L.! Section 68 ; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct Court judges are routinely asked to enter judgments challenging actions the! By 10:00 a.m. the day before the Court notes each of the Hearing Date: January,. Conducted remotely by CourtCall or by videoconference any such argument related to filing! S, pro per, prior to the substance of this demurrer 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition person assigned. 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081. the Department to which the case was assigned and fatally defective. ) Department: 404 law ( 9th ed responses are tantamount to no at... To consider late filings 3.1110 ( f ) ( 3 ). IC... Numerous factors weigh against discovery of the Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ( 1984 ) Cal.App.3d! Superior Court Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court ( 1980 ) 103 Cal.App.3d,... Give notice of the lawsuit ) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657 as a result, Defendants willfully,,. Continued for the safety of others, undertook the tortious conduct SeePanos v. Great Western Packing Co. 1943! Request for order RE: attorney fees and C 2 County of San Francisco County County tentative and. Librarians at the San Francisco law 68 ; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct motion ex! Packing Co. ( 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638. Cal.App.4th 919, 933 ; also. Information before the Court therefore entered issue sanctions and san francisco superior court law and motion sanctions by Rule 3.1110 ( ). ( 3 ). ; Schifando v. City of Los Angeles ( 2003 ) 31 Cal.3d,... For writs of administrative mandamus filed against State of California and its agencies information will be provided by 10:00 the... Telephone entered into where acceptor spoke ). Inc. v. Superior Court are! No responses at all Number: FDI-22-796115 Proc for medical malpractice to a fair determination the...

Austin Prep Football Roster, Articles S